| 1 |
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> he does not. In fact he does not have to enable anything of this. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Here is a close to perfect xorg.conf, with composite/aiglx working: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> <snip xorg.conf not containing an extension section> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> you'll also need to enable texturedrender in your device section to |
| 10 |
>> enable the Xv. i've been not |
| 11 |
>> using fglrx for some months now (the xf86-video-ati is quite enough |
| 12 |
>> for my needs) and i don't |
| 13 |
>> remember all the hacks that are available for fglrx driver. look at |
| 14 |
>> the phoronix forums for more |
| 15 |
>> detailed configuration infos about fglrx. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> no, he does not. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Check the symlinks in your system. Give us your xorg.0.log. |
| 22 |
> For me (using some leaked 9.1beta) I have to restart X to get glx (and |
| 23 |
> composite) for some mysterious reasons. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
Here's the log. Restarting doesn't help. If by "check the symlinks" you |
| 26 |
mean the OpenGL symlinks, those are correct. Direct rendering works, and |
| 27 |
video acceleration works, too. (A lot better than with the old driver.) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
The log contains a line that says "AIGLX disabled", but the next line |
| 31 |
says "fglrx: Force AIGLX enabled". I'm confused. My Google search |
| 32 |
suggests that this isn't a real problem, but I'm not sure. (After all, |
| 33 |
Google only finds it mentioned in logs posted by people that do have |
| 34 |
problems - it's just that nobody mentions those lines.) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
A slightly related question: I need a DRI section in my xorg.conf to |
| 37 |
make the group of /dev/dri/card0 "video". This feels like a hack. |
| 38 |
Shouldn't this work via udev rules? |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Sebastian |
Archives