Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind?
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:03:59
Message-Id: 200906161303.39140.hwoarang@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind? by Frank Peters
1 > In a lot of cases, for example perl, Xorg, and gcc, the Gentoo
2 > distribution lags far behind the latest available releases.
3 > Even allowing the "~amd64" unstable series, this remains true.
4 > Why is this so?
5 Xorg? We have 2.6.2_pre . gcc? We have 4.4.0 . I dont know about perl :)
6 >
7 > I had first considered moving to Gentoo in the fall of 2008,
8 > but after noticing that the only version of gcc available at
9 > that time was gcc-3.x, I postponed the change. In the spring
10 > of 2009, Gentoo finally moved up to gcc-4.3.x and then I made
11 > the transition. But the update to the 4.3 series was a long time
12 > in coming.
13 >
14 We need to test them extensively. It is not just all about the ebuilds. Sure
15 we can write the ebuilds of every shiny new application and put them on
16 mirrors. But we want to test them before we release them. We dont want our
17 users to use experimental ebuilds/software without extensive testing.
18 Packaging is easy but all the background testing is hard. Our goal is not to
19 provide new ebuilds as fast as we can but to provide stable and working
20 applications. If this is not what you want then you can switch to another
21 distro that all it does is packaging o:). Finally as you can see here
22 http://cia.vc/, Gentoo is every day on the TOP10 active projects ;)
23
24 --
25 Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
26 Gentoo Linux Developer [KDE/Qt/Sunrise/Sound]
27 Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why Is Gentoo So Far Behind? "Arttu V." <arttuv69@×××××.com>