1 |
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Sebastian |
2 |
Beßler<sebastian@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
3 |
> Paul Hartman schrieb: |
4 |
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:16 AM, BRM<bm_witness@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>>> Not everyone upgrades their video card every 6 months. |
6 |
>>> Most probably get a video card upgrade only when they buy a new computer; |
7 |
>>> and most don't buy a new computer every other year either, probably more like 4 years or so. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> You can get a GeForce 9600 for around USD$50, which comes near the |
10 |
>> performance of the famously-expensive 8800 series (or at least near |
11 |
>> enough for costing hundreds of dollars less), and has an H.264 decoder |
12 |
>> so you can use vdpau with mplayer or mythtv to allow even very slow |
13 |
>> computers to play high-res video smoothly. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Many mainboards from that time only have AGP not PCI-E and to get a 9600 |
16 |
> with AGP is not easy or even possible, so that is not really a option. |
17 |
|
18 |
I have an old Pentium 4 box which has a PCI-E video card. If a |
19 |
computer is so old it doesn't even have PCI-E, its owner probably |
20 |
wouldn't expect 3D desktop effects to work so well in the first place. |
21 |
|
22 |
My old PII 266MHz had an AGP 3dfx card. I wonder if KDE4 desktop |
23 |
effects would run well on that? :) |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
> And even if it is possible why trash a card that most of the time works |
27 |
> and needs only a fraction of the power of a modern card? |
28 |
|
29 |
If your primary concern is power usage, you're probably not going to |
30 |
use the desktop effects anyway. To improve performance, which is what |
31 |
I thought we were talking about, you could get a better-performing |
32 |
card. |
33 |
|
34 |
I could ride a horse to work but I choose to drive a car instead |
35 |
because it is faster. :) |