1 |
"Arttu V." <arttuv69@×××××.com> posted |
2 |
fecdbac60907080910p1ac75f11pa686a0bb36dadc9f@××××××××××.com, excerpted |
3 |
below, on Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:10:12 +0300: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Or at least that's what it did to me last week when I was experimenting |
6 |
> something utterly stupid with kernel memory settings on a box with 2GB |
7 |
> physical RAM, 8 GB swap, /var/tmp/portage mounted on tmpfs with |
8 |
> size=9000M, and trying to emerge openoffice -- while only having |
9 |
> compiled a kernel which could handle a maximum of 4GB of memory ... :) |
10 |
|
11 |
You had me laughing, but in all seriousness, that's a good test of |
12 |
conditions many of us aren't likely to see very often. So at least we |
13 |
know the failure mode, now, and know it doesn't fail the entire system, |
14 |
which is more than at least I knew before. =:^) |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
18 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
19 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |