| 1 |
Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> write: |
| 2 |
> That's the beauty of Open Source. Commercial development would have |
| 3 |
> killed off FAT because of its low popularity, but Open Source maintains |
| 4 |
> FAT capability because it is something that *should* be available, if |
| 5 |
> only to allow some small group to tinker with ancient systems. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Nah, Microsoft kept and would have kept FAT, not to mention |
| 8 |
COMMAND.COM. IBM systems, traditionally, kept vestiges of stuff from |
| 9 |
the Pleistocene, all of it carefully documented. |
Archives