1 |
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 17:29 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: |
2 |
> %% Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> cg> Now, if you want portdir_overlay to act how you think it should |
5 |
> cg> act, then do *not* use it with your snapshot target, but use it |
6 |
> cg> with your other targets. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Ah! Hm. I didn't realize it had any impact for the other targets. So, |
9 |
> you're saying when it's set for the non-snapshot targets it basically |
10 |
> does $PORTDIR_OVERLAY-type functionality? |
11 |
|
12 |
Actually... I was wrong... I *thought* we had extended that |
13 |
functionality, but it doesn't look like we have. |
14 |
|
15 |
Anyway, the portdir_overlay is an actual overlay onto the portage tree, |
16 |
not a separate overlay that is used by portage itself. |
17 |
|
18 |
By the way, this is why I don't use the thing. I *always* simply edit |
19 |
the portage tree before making the snapshot. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Chris Gianelloni |
23 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
24 |
Games - Developer |
25 |
Gentoo Linux |