1 |
Hello Jorge, |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
On 06/25/2012 02:17 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
5 |
>> it seems there is a tag |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> CATALYST-2.0.9 |
8 |
> |
9 |
>> in Git but no trace of an ebuild in Gentoo. If there is purpose |
10 |
>> here, have you considered adding a masked ebuild, instead? |
11 |
>> What is your motivation for the current approach? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> This isn't a "bug". I've tagged the release to test a few things |
14 |
> related to the move from make.conf and make.profile from /etc to |
15 |
> /etc/portage. I'll add the ebuild to the tree in a few days. |
16 |
|
17 |
It's been two weeks. Please add an ebuild for 2.0.9 to give |
18 |
interested users of catalyst the chance to check it out. If you feel |
19 |
it's too "hot" for mass consumption please mask it one way |
20 |
(package.mask) or another (KEYWORDS=""). |
21 |
|
22 |
For the future I propose we really release releases (i.e. git tag, |
23 |
tarball and and ebuild) or to make no release tag if if there is no |
24 |
release. For plain testing a git-describe-like label and a snapshot |
25 |
should be sufficient to my understanding: |
26 |
|
27 |
# git describe --tags | sed 's|^CATALYST-||' |
28 |
2.0.9-262-gb3a0ffb |
29 |
|
30 |
Thanks! |
31 |
|
32 |
Best, |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
Sebastian |