| 1 |
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello Jorge, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 06/25/2012 02:17 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> it seems there is a tag |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> CATALYST-2.0.9 |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>>> in Git but no trace of an ebuild in Gentoo. If there is purpose |
| 11 |
>>> here, have you considered adding a masked ebuild, instead? |
| 12 |
>>> What is your motivation for the current approach? |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> This isn't a "bug". I've tagged the release to test a few things |
| 15 |
>> related to the move from make.conf and make.profile from /etc to |
| 16 |
>> /etc/portage. I'll add the ebuild to the tree in a few days. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> It's been two weeks. Please add an ebuild for 2.0.9 to give |
| 19 |
> interested users of catalyst the chance to check it out. If you feel |
| 20 |
> it's too "hot" for mass consumption please mask it one way |
| 21 |
> (package.mask) or another (KEYWORDS=""). |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> For the future I propose we really release releases (i.e. git tag, |
| 24 |
> tarball and and ebuild) or to make no release tag if if there is no |
| 25 |
> release. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I completely agree with all of this. |
Archives