1 |
Thanks! |
2 |
|
3 |
When I first read about this idea I was very enthusiastic because I |
4 |
remembered my first attempt to install Gentoo. A tool that would |
5 |
simplify the process, but still keep the Gentoo "philosophy" is really |
6 |
useful. |
7 |
|
8 |
To be honest, what really concerns me is the architecture of the server |
9 |
(cpu and hdd). But if I succeed in making it, even for one connection |
10 |
simulated on my computer, then I am sure that it will be a great success. |
11 |
|
12 |
Thank you very much for the link! |
13 |
|
14 |
Erick Michau wrote: |
15 |
> Hi, |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Depending on your approach you might eventually be interested in a similar |
18 |
> tool called metro available at http://wiki.github.com/funtoo/metro |
19 |
> It provides similar features at certain levels and noticeable differences |
20 |
> too. It currently builds stable and unstable gentoo stages. Reading through |
21 |
> gives some knowledge about building stages. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> It sounds like a very exciting project and the first questions that pop up |
24 |
> to my mind are: how would one interface catalyst/metro with a website? is |
25 |
> there any already existing similar framework? How much space would the |
26 |
> server require for how many concurrent users building stage1->3 all at the |
27 |
> same time? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I have no clue as for the answers but it really feels like an interesting |
30 |
> challenge. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |