| 1 |
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:16 -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 2 |
> Matthias Langer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Can anybody explain to me what i'm doing wrong (i'm using |
| 4 |
> > catalyst-1.1.10.10) ? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> That's what you're doing wrong :) Catalyst 1.x is no longer being supported. You |
| 7 |
> should use catalyst-2.0_rc40. From the above output, it looks like you did |
| 8 |
> something silly when making your snapshot (did you make it by hand or use |
| 9 |
> catalyst's snapshot target?) or your seed stage didn't have a make.profile symlink. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Hmm, i've now installed catalyst-2.0_rc40 and did: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
# catalyst2 -s 20060315 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
to create a portage snapshot and then |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
# catalyst2 -f livecd-stage1.spec |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
However, i get: |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Performing Global Updates: /usr/portage/profiles/updates/1Q-2006 |
| 22 |
(Could take a couple of minutes if you have a lot of binary packages.) |
| 23 |
.='update pass' *='binary update' @='/var/db move' |
| 24 |
s='/var/db SLOT move' S='binary SLOT move' |
| 25 |
p='update /etc/portage/package.*' |
| 26 |
................................ |
| 27 |
>>> --newuse implies --update... adding --update to options. |
| 28 |
!!! ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink? |
| 29 |
!!! Is the symlink correct? Is your portage tree complete? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
!!! catalyst: Error in attempt to build packages |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
But |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
#ls -l /etc/make.profile |
| 37 |
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Mar 3 03:04 /etc/make.profile |
| 38 |
-> /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.0 |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
seems to be correct and my portage tree works fine ... |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list |
Archives