1 |
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 13:42 +0100, Matthias Langer wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:16 -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
3 |
> > Matthias Langer wrote: |
4 |
> > > Can anybody explain to me what i'm doing wrong (i'm using |
5 |
> > > catalyst-1.1.10.10) ? |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > That's what you're doing wrong :) Catalyst 1.x is no longer being supported. You |
8 |
> > should use catalyst-2.0_rc40. From the above output, it looks like you did |
9 |
> > something silly when making your snapshot (did you make it by hand or use |
10 |
> > catalyst's snapshot target?) or your seed stage didn't have a make.profile symlink. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Hmm, i've now installed catalyst-2.0_rc40 and did: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> # catalyst2 -s 20060315 |
15 |
> |
16 |
> to create a portage snapshot and then |
17 |
> |
18 |
> # catalyst2 -f livecd-stage1.spec |
19 |
> |
20 |
> However, i get: |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Performing Global Updates: /usr/portage/profiles/updates/1Q-2006 |
23 |
> (Could take a couple of minutes if you have a lot of binary packages.) |
24 |
> .='update pass' *='binary update' @='/var/db move' |
25 |
> s='/var/db SLOT move' S='binary SLOT move' |
26 |
> p='update /etc/portage/package.*' |
27 |
> ................................ |
28 |
> >>> --newuse implies --update... adding --update to options. |
29 |
> !!! ARCH is not set... Are you missing the /etc/make.profile symlink? |
30 |
> !!! Is the symlink correct? Is your portage tree complete? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> |
33 |
> !!! catalyst: Error in attempt to build packages |
34 |
> |
35 |
> But |
36 |
> |
37 |
> #ls -l /etc/make.profile |
38 |
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Mar 3 03:04 /etc/make.profile |
39 |
> -> /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.0 |
40 |
> |
41 |
> seems to be correct and my portage tree works fine ... |
42 |
> |
43 |
> |
44 |
Maybe this is important: I used an unmodified stage3-x86-2006.0.tar.bz2 |
45 |
as seed stage ... |
46 |
|
47 |
-- |
48 |
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list |