1 |
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 17:47 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: |
2 |
> Then, I ran into a problem with the very latest kernel (2.6.12-r4) where |
3 |
> the genpatches version it required (7) was not available on the gentoo |
4 |
> site or any of the mirrors. I dropped back to the 2.6.11 kernel using a |
5 |
> package.mask file. |
6 |
|
7 |
Hrrrmn... it is working here... strange. |
8 |
|
9 |
> Anyway. On booting I tried to add the unionfs flag to the boot line and |
10 |
> noticed this bug in linuxrc: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> unionfs) |
13 |
> if [ ! -x /sbin/unionctl ] |
14 |
> then |
15 |
> USE_UNIONFS_NORMAL=0 |
16 |
> bad_msg 'Unionctl not found: aborting use of unionfs!' |
17 |
> else |
18 |
> USE_UNIONFS_NORMAL=1 |
19 |
> fi |
20 |
> ;; |
21 |
> |
22 |
> But, when I install this unionctl IS there: it lives in /usr/sbin, not |
23 |
> /sbin. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> unionfs\=*) |
26 |
> if [ ! -x /sbin/unionctl ] |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Ditto here. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> I know this is in genkernel not catalyst; should I file a bug or is this |
31 |
> good enough? |
32 |
|
33 |
So it is in /usr/sbin within the initrd? Yeah, that definitely should |
34 |
be filed as a bug and assigned to genkernel@g.o, if you would. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Chris Gianelloni |
38 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
39 |
Games - Developer |
40 |
Gentoo Linux |