1 |
Hi! Thanks replying so quickly. Your answers are helpful. |
2 |
|
3 |
John Davis wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
>I assume that you are planning on using the tarballs solely for |
6 |
>installs, correct? The binary packages that you build can be installed |
7 |
>via Portage over an NFS share or something. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
Yes. That's my plan. |
11 |
|
12 |
>Instead of tinderboxes, consider using the "grp" target. Tinderboxes are |
13 |
>used more for building a set of packages and then logging the successes/ |
14 |
>failures. The "grp" target will do exactly what you are looking for and |
15 |
>will organize all of the binary packages by profile type, arch, etc. Let |
16 |
>me know if you need help on how to setup a grp build. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
I had dismissed using GRP before because it didn't seem to be what I |
20 |
wanted. I will look more closely at it now. |
21 |
|
22 |
>Catalyst supports the configuration files in /etc/portage. Just add the |
23 |
>following to your spec file (works for any build target): |
24 |
> |
25 |
>portage_confdir: /etc/portage |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
Ahh, cool. I'm going to go bang on it some more and see what I get done. |
29 |
|
30 |
Thanks, |
31 |
|
32 |
William |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
No virus found in this outgoing message. |
38 |
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. |
39 |
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.4 - Release Date: 2004-12-22 |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list |