Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Problem with NMAP

[Kosta Todorovic]

I believe Chris was giving me a solution that meant not modifying my
live portage tree at all. But I guess its not a big deal if i unmask
it in package.keywords. Could even do it temporarily.

On 4/22/05, derek tracy <tracyde@×××××.com> wrote:
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but to solve your problem I would
> just create a package.keywords file to unmask libstdc++-v3 in your
> portage_conf directory.  Read the examples that get emerged with
> catalyst if you need further help I can walk you through it but all
> documentation is included with catalyst.
>
> I beleive that the perk to rolling your own portage snapshot is that
> you can include your portage_overlay that you have setup on the
> computer that you are building the livecd from.
>
> e.g.
> I have sys-kernel/love-sources on my host computer's portage overlay
> directory and when I roll my own portage snapshot it includes that
> along with the normal portage snapshot.
>
> On 4/22/05, Kosta Todorovic <kostodo@×××××.com> wrote:
> > > Yes.  It will be made from your $PORTDIR, wherever that may be.
> >
> > What are the advantages of using the live portage tree rather than a
> > downloaded snapshot?
> > Is it possible to use a downloaded snapshot and put an overlay to make
> > a new snapshot?
> > Is there any point of doing this?
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list
> >
> >
>
> --
> gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list
>
>

-- 
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list