| 1 |
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 11:51 -0400, Christophe PEREZ wrote: |
| 2 |
> Le Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:48:37 -0400, Chris Gianelloni a écrit : |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > You shouldn't ever really need to make your own stages unless you're |
| 5 |
> > just wanting more up-to-date versions. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Ok, clear. |
| 8 |
> And, in this case, I have to build my own portage snapshot and all |
| 9 |
> stage{1,2,3}, that's right ? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If you wanted updated stages, yes. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> ====== |
| 14 |
> Other thing : |
| 15 |
> Build my own portage snapshot is the only way to use an ebuild I made ? |
| 16 |
> No portage overlay system ? |
| 17 |
> I tried to define PORTDIR_OVERLAY in envscript, but I have an error : |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> !!! Invalid PORTDIR_OVERLAY (not a dir): /etc/catalyst2/portage-overlay |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> # ls /etc/catalyst2/portage-overlay/ |
| 23 |
> net-misc |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> It would be very sad to have to build snapshot and all stages juste to |
| 26 |
> have one soft more, but may be it's the only way. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Ehh... Please read through /usr/share/doc/catalyst-2.0_rc*/examples |
| 29 |
before continuing to ask questions that are already answered there... ;] |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 33 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 34 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 35 |
Games - Developer |
| 36 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives