| 1 |
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 03:45:59PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 2 |
> BUT, things are rather slow at getting done at the moment. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
jmbsvicetto was talking a while back (last month?) about cutting a new |
| 5 |
release. Any word on that front? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Personally I think it may be better to wait a bit on the py3 |
| 8 |
> compatibility changes. Many of the potential problem spots will |
| 9 |
> need fixing anyway, so conversion would likely be smoother after |
| 10 |
> some more re-write work is done. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
This brings the total number of people chomping at the bit to refactor |
| 13 |
catalyst code up to three‽ There must be something we can do to help |
| 14 |
unclog the maintenance pipe? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> you can get my rewite branch so far at |
| 17 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dolsen/catalyst/ |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> When you clone it, it will compain about not being able to check out |
| 20 |
> master. You will need to "git checkout re-write". But I would just add |
| 21 |
> my url as another remote to your current clone and fetch it. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sounds like a job for: |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
git clone --branch rewrite http://dev.gentoo.org/~dolsen/catalyst/ |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
(your branch name doesn't actually have a hyphen ;). FWIW, you can |
| 28 |
also take a look at my stuff [1]. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Cheers, |
| 31 |
Trevor |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
[1]: http://git.tremily.us/?p=catalyst.git |
| 34 |
Branch summaries in, for example: |
| 35 |
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.catalyst/2099/focus=2221 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). |
| 39 |
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy |
Archives