| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Martino Dell'Ambrogio |
| 2 |
<martino.dellambrogio@××××.ch> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Hello, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I'm trying to build a livecd with catalyst 2.0.6.916. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> While building the livecd-stage1 target I've got this obvious error: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-java/sun-jdk" have been masked. |
| 10 |
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
| 11 |
> request: |
| 12 |
> - dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.26 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s)) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I set portage_confdir to a path with a package.license file containing the |
| 15 |
> line "dev-java/sun-jdk dlj-1.1", but I got the same result. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I tried with a package.license directory, with a "*" flag, even with an |
| 18 |
> export ACCEPT_LICENSE="*" within catalystrc, but portage seems to ignore all |
| 19 |
> of them. |
| 20 |
> The portage version is 2.1.9.42 for both host and build. Also both systems |
| 21 |
> are amd64. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I can't seem to find my error anywhere, and I guess catalyst is aware of |
| 24 |
> everything LICENSE-related or it wouldn't be possible to build the official |
| 25 |
> distributions, right? Thank you for your help. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Actually, the only references I see to 'license' when I grep the |
| 28 |
catalyst source appear in license headers. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
It looks to me like catalyst doesn't export any way to modify |
| 31 |
ACCEPT_LICENSES, though I would have thought that putting 'export |
| 32 |
ACCEPT_LICENSES=...' in catalystrc would work. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Matt |
Archives