| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:30:40PM -0800, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 2 |
> My aim for now is to debug the hell out of it, to stabilize all the |
| 3 |
> existing changes, BEFORE doing a ton more changes. That will also give |
| 4 |
> me more experience in how catalyst is used, possibly ideas how to change |
| 5 |
> it for the better. I'll fix the doc's generation and make a setup.py |
| 6 |
> and new 9999 ebuild. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I'm not suggesting additional changes on top of yours, I'm suggesting |
| 9 |
new ones underneath yours, or alternatives to your current series. It |
| 10 |
seems a shame to spend time testing a work in progress, since you'll |
| 11 |
probably want to re-test the final form before merging. I'm trying to |
| 12 |
help polish your series down before we invest a lot of time testing. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Plus I need to focus more on another project needed for the git tree |
| 15 |
> migration. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I have no problem waiting on the catalyst front if it helps push the |
| 18 |
Git migration through. I've been wishing for that for a while :D. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Instead of making my suggested changes on top of your series, I can |
| 21 |
also make them underneath your series, and help rebase your series on |
| 22 |
top. That gets the changes I want in, and lets you focus on other |
| 23 |
things at the same time ;). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I'm also ok with just waiting until folks have more time (e.g. the |
| 26 |
catalyst-spec man page cooked for five months ;). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Cheers, |
| 29 |
Trevor |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). |
| 33 |
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy |
Archives