Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Make existing multi-overlay support more explicit | ||
| Date: | Fri, 30 Oct 2020 15:54:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38GpfNk-K6OG148G+xsZnVaMXYnLHYutmkEXD0n8+LOa0A@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-catalyst] Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Make existing multi-overlay support more explicit by Felix Bier |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 11:07 AM Felix Bier |
| 2 | <Felix.Bier@×××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > The code already supports multiple overlays. This commit adapts the |
| 5 | > documentation to make this more explicit. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Looks good, though I wonder if we shouldn't rename 'portage_overlay' |
| 8 | as well? 'repos' or something? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | I'm going to change the custom .spec format over to TOML soon, so I |
| 11 | can do that then unless you want to handle it. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | I'll commit this if you will give me your Signed-off-by for the patches. Thanks! |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [Newsletter] Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Make existing multi-overlay support more explicit | Felix Bier <Felix.Bier@×××××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [Newsletter] Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Make existing multi-overlay support more explicit | Felix Bier <Felix.Bier@×××××××××××××.com> |