| 1 |
Am Freitag, den 30.10.2020, 11:54 -0400 schrieb Matt Turner:
|
| 2 |
> Looks good, though I wonder if we shouldn't rename 'portage_overlay' |
| 3 |
> as well? 'repos' or something? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I'm going to change the custom .spec format over to TOML soon, so I |
| 6 |
> can do that then unless you want to handle it. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I agree that 'portage_overlay' should be renamed. It seems 'repos' is
|
| 9 |
already taken (for the portage snapshot feature). We could rename
|
| 10 |
'repos' -> 'repos_storedir' and then 'portage_overlay' -> 'repos', but
|
| 11 |
I would prefer to keep this step separate from the PORTDIR_OVERLAY
|
| 12 |
removal.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
My plan for the next steps would be:
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
* Remove PORTDIR as well
|
| 17 |
* Remove copying of overlays in favor of mounting
|
| 18 |
* Somehow merge 'snapshot_treeish' and 'portage_overlay' into a single
|
| 19 |
option (called e.g. 'repos'), which takes a list of repo snapshots. So
|
| 20 |
there would no longer be a special main repo.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I'll commit this if you will give me your Signed-off-by for the |
| 24 |
> patches. Thanks! |
Archives