| 1 |
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:30 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 2 |
> You didn't post the spec you used, so there's not really much we can |
| 3 |
> help you |
| 4 |
> with. However, you're using an experimental stage as seed and likely |
| 5 |
> using an |
| 6 |
> experimental profile, and you're surprised that it broke? :) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Sorry, i forgot the spec: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
subarch: x86 |
| 11 |
target: stage1 |
| 12 |
version_stamp: 20070710 |
| 13 |
rel_type: testbuild |
| 14 |
profile: uclibc/x86/2.4 |
| 15 |
snapshot: 20070710 |
| 16 |
source_subpath: testbuild/seedstage-x86-20070710 |
| 17 |
chost: i386-gentoo-linux-uclibc |
| 18 |
cflags: -Os -pipe |
| 19 |
cxxflags: -Os -pipe |
| 20 |
ldflags: -Wl,-z,relro |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Everything that is in there i got from inside the stage tarball used. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> If you're doing anything like this, you should be able to easily debug |
| 25 |
> this |
| 26 |
> problem. My bet is that there's something screwed up in the profile |
| 27 |
> (like glibc |
| 28 |
> is p.masked and virtual/libc only has glibc listed). |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
But since i chrooted inside and virtual/libc could be resolved, this |
| 31 |
should not be the case. I think. As i said, all teh catalyst |
| 32 |
configuration is from the stage tarball i used. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Philipp |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list |
Archives