| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 11:07 -0600, William Kilian wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>I don't get duplicates because I have procmail recipe that catches them all... |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>Nifty. Would you be kind enough to share this recipe? I would |
| 11 |
>appreciate it greatly. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
Certainly: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
:0 Wh: msgid.lock |
| 17 |
| formail -D 32768 msgid.cache |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
It's similar to 2 examples in man procmailex. There are some other |
| 20 |
really cool recipes in there -- backup last n messages comes to mind. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
>>I don't want to start any holy wars about MUAs or list policy, but I think the list should be overriding Reply-To headers. |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>Actually, that is an infrastructure thing. They won't do it, and I |
| 26 |
>agree with them. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
OK |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
>Anyway, if Thuderbird has no way to reply-to-list, then Thunderbird |
| 32 |
>should be extended. Is there a feature request already out there for |
| 33 |
>this? I know that in evolution, you must select "Reply to List" from |
| 34 |
>the context menu, as there's no button for it. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
There might be an extension that implements just that feature or a |
| 38 |
functionally equivalent feature. If I get tired of fixing my headers, |
| 39 |
I'll do something to make my life easier ;-) |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Will |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
No virus found in this outgoing message. |
| 48 |
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. |
| 49 |
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.13 - Release Date: 2005-01-16 |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-- |
| 52 |
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list |
Archives