1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 26-06-2011 17:55, Peter Stuge wrote: |
5 |
> William Hubbs wrote: |
6 |
>> Yes, it was added a couple of days ago, without giving a reasonable |
7 |
>> amount of time for discussion. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> You know just as well as I do that this thread is the most discussion |
10 |
> that this mailing list has seen in a very long time. Sebastian wants |
11 |
> to make some progress. I see no problem. |
12 |
|
13 |
Yes and I'm happy to see people interested on catalyst. |
14 |
However, given the recent discussions I feel I should point out that |
15 |
catalyst is Release Engineering's team release tool and not a "toy" for |
16 |
people to tinker with. |
17 |
I appreciate the interest all of you are showing for the tool and I |
18 |
appreciate any improvements, but I and other releng team members need |
19 |
this tool to work for us to have releases. |
20 |
|
21 |
>> For a significant change like this, |
22 |
> |
23 |
> "significant" is so subjective though. |
24 |
|
25 |
It did made a significant change to the dependencies of catalyst. |
26 |
I haven't checked it closely yet, but I also wonder if all the |
27 |
additional deps are worth avoiding a single man page in the tarball. |
28 |
|
29 |
>> I think we should give 24-48 hours and make the patch visible |
30 |
>> somewhere |
31 |
> |
32 |
> It is clear that you are displeased because you think you did not |
33 |
> have a chance to oppose the change before it was made. I can |
34 |
> understand, but in reality I doubt the one opposing voice would |
35 |
> have made a difference. |
36 |
|
37 |
William is not the only one to have concerns about this change. |
38 |
Also, prior to the subscription by agaffney, armin76 and myself, this |
39 |
list probably had little if any releng members. As this is a releng |
40 |
tool, not having us around to "object" doesn't make it ok to commit |
41 |
changes without ensuring releng is ok with the changes. |
42 |
|
43 |
>> Based on this as well as my previous objections I would like to see |
44 |
>> this change reverted. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> I disagree and hope that most others do as well, so that development |
47 |
> will continue instead of being stuck on senseless arguing with you. |
48 |
|
49 |
I'm sorry but this is not about arguing with William. This is about |
50 |
making sure that the people interested as well as the direct consumers |
51 |
of the tool are ok with any proposed changes. |
52 |
I'm sure no one wants to risk causing a split that could lead to either |
53 |
releng assuming control of catalyst again or worse causing a fork in the |
54 |
code. |
55 |
|
56 |
> What about my suggestion to fix the actual problem, asciidoc |
57 |
> dependencies, did you bother looking into that yet? (I haven't |
58 |
> because I don't feel at all strongly.) |
59 |
> |
60 |
> Thanks! |
61 |
> |
62 |
> |
63 |
> //Peter |
64 |
|
65 |
- -- |
66 |
Regards, |
67 |
|
68 |
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org |
69 |
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng |
70 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
71 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
72 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
73 |
|
74 |
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOB8AxAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPyeAP/iQ26OaLYHOaE8SirGp1nsiP |
75 |
ET6RKcO60a25SeiicIgM6jcJ0HX6u71G6DEPR9jI4dk6yxQoNCxsfvLimIURqhHU |
76 |
GAwdowhaa0dRQtaQejLYFo30t2TrzhqPsFu+oILskeLifOqoQDWvHG2IeBvQ04Vl |
77 |
dB8rA6GKu4EKbY/i0XreFO8rjOgW2rjTY8PB+hDagGUK0mqqle1VlHJmW/w5pNwD |
78 |
NhyyGIwHY7M6sf+HI6QgGr6nzUYeAxMbBtozu/kTNtqp09fkjtis35cKMPYExyCF |
79 |
8w9mTgLsqa151nIcDP7+IhWkJKPnaxS7EHg2mApnZH4JRNEHd39CJLPVk2Gg3FQg |
80 |
2lp5K4N4JjePC1Ejd5ciL5Po/R7wAsFT2rLwk35xSTM/nhv6lAOjc/Qq2xEA5IUg |
81 |
5uU6crwthJOMj07kqiT+YuT6mOK3NnNObkpLnyx7aAQAjTe8LfUWEtVSSgJ40wM2 |
82 |
xTLAE1uDVK7lI/PD4pL+DtFjej263RSRha5PRmYDg24yMTZoV2ZExc4vzbqfrysp |
83 |
TjNc7kdWtZrzr4a4snGkzpKhD2gI9ivjorfsQr32QXaiSK/+1uLkF9sQIyy2YOvl |
84 |
qsZiu7hImn39hzJRWbnjv9cxnT/zVs5Q0K32W4FJyqBP3YLmFPtE4UdES1wxDhuH |
85 |
kV6bW26ZyWLnt/txLQYY |
86 |
=crYh |
87 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |