1 |
William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> Yes, it was added a couple of days ago, without giving a reasonable |
3 |
> amount of time for discussion. |
4 |
|
5 |
You know just as well as I do that this thread is the most discussion |
6 |
that this mailing list has seen in a very long time. Sebastian wants |
7 |
to make some progress. I see no problem. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
> For a significant change like this, |
11 |
|
12 |
"significant" is so subjective though. |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
> I think we should give 24-48 hours and make the patch visible |
16 |
> somewhere |
17 |
|
18 |
It is clear that you are displeased because you think you did not |
19 |
have a chance to oppose the change before it was made. I can |
20 |
understand, but in reality I doubt the one opposing voice would |
21 |
have made a difference. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
> Remember that we have people here in multiple time zones, |
25 |
|
26 |
This is a given for all project. Not sure why you think anyone needs |
27 |
to be reminded of this. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
> and we don't necessarily check these lists every day. |
31 |
|
32 |
I would set some kind of notification up, so that response does not |
33 |
depend on me checking something. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
> Based on this as well as my previous objections I would like to see |
37 |
> this change reverted. |
38 |
|
39 |
I disagree and hope that most others do as well, so that development |
40 |
will continue instead of being stuck on senseless arguing with you. |
41 |
|
42 |
What about my suggestion to fix the actual problem, asciidoc |
43 |
dependencies, did you bother looking into that yet? (I haven't |
44 |
because I don't feel at all strongly.) |
45 |
|
46 |
Thanks! |
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
//Peter |