1 |
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 11:44:55AM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> >> * Now we need to have a build time dependency, at least for the live |
4 |
> >> ebuild, which pulls in about 34mb of downloads just to build the man |
5 |
> >> page. |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> >> Since we are just talking about a man page, imho this is a lot of bloat |
8 |
> >> for very little gain. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > I disagree on bloat and on little gain. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > If you insist on changing status quo I would like to call in a vote. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Well, in fairness, the asciidoc dependency was just added a day or so ago. |
15 |
|
16 |
Yes, it was added a couple of days ago, without giving a reasonable |
17 |
amount of time for discussion. |
18 |
|
19 |
I'll post the links to the rfc [1], the approval message [2] and the |
20 |
message where the change was checked in [3] below. Notice that this all |
21 |
happened within a period less than 24 hours. |
22 |
|
23 |
For a significant change like this, I |
24 |
think we should give 24-48 hours and make the patch visible somewhere so |
25 |
that others can look at the change and comment on it before it gets |
26 |
checked in. Remember that we have people here in multiple time zones, |
27 |
and we don't necessarily check these lists every day. |
28 |
|
29 |
Based on this as well as my previous objections I would like to see this |
30 |
change reverted. |
31 |
|
32 |
William |
33 |
|
34 |
[1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-catalyst/msg_78cd6eae401bfa7a499418bc6cbc225e.xml |
35 |
[2] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-catalyst/msg_65f2fce710454e481973d0e2c6cc5265.xml |
36 |
[3] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-catalyst/msg_f2eb026c4c4af90650952ca81a5fd6b6.xml |