Re: [gentoo-catalyst] Re: Bumping a few patches (releng-link, bugs, spec-comments, pandoc-mediawiki, ...)

[Brian Dolbec]

On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:04:04 -0700
"W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 04:27:27PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > I would prefer to get to them in close order to what they are in 3.0
> > now.  It should mean less rebasing to make them and the other
> > commits fit master which will have additional changes along the
> > process or review/merge.
>
> No problem (I'm clearly not in a big hurry ;).  I just noticed that
> term-env-var had landed in master (with c753911), and that I'd posted
> the pandoc-mediawiki branch since my last bump, and didn't want to
> forget those changes.
>
> If it would help shrink 3.0 faster, I can check my outstanding
> branches for orthogonality and just submit a list that apply cleanly
> both underneath and on top of 3.0.  I'm unclear on which parts of 3.0
> have already landed, but I think most of my branches are poking things
> that are independent of your 3.0 restructuring.
>
> Cheers,
> Trevor
>


I've attached the 3.0 log I made that shows all the commits since the
start.  I've tried to mark off all commits that are in master or now
pending.  What I did is set highlighting to python and type Done
and surround the commit with triple quotes.  That way they are a little
easier to tell apart.  

I know there are some mistakes in it.  Some of the later commits were
incorporated into earlier ones.  I should have done this list from the
start.  But anyway, for those commits, they should not apply/or be
blank commits which git will report.


Anyway, I am working from the bottom of the file to the top.  I'll
start testing, splitting/squashing the commits in pending now.  I may
pull some later commits that fix issues in these early ones while I'm
testing, if I remember I had later commits fixing things in these.
-- 
Brian Dolbec <dolsen>