| 1 |
Nelson Batalha wrote: |
| 2 |
> What I'm saying is: catalyst is awesome and is a few command options |
| 3 |
> away from being acessible to much more people. You may just want a |
| 4 |
> livecd to use once and not maintain it (short lifespan games cd's for |
| 5 |
> instance). It's an option people. Want to use it perfectly ignore the |
| 6 |
> option. Want a quick dirty built use it that's all :). |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
What this really comes down to is that none of the catalyst developers (right |
| 9 |
now, that's Chris and I) are going to go out of our way to implement something |
| 10 |
that neither of us will *ever* use. If you want functionality like this, perhaps |
| 11 |
you should write a patch and submit it. Maybe we'll include it, maybe not. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Many OSS developers get annoyed when people demand new features but are |
| 14 |
unwilling to "put their money where their mouth is" and write the code themselves. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-catalyst@g.o mailing list |
Archives