| 1 |
On Thursday 21 February 2008, lurker wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 21/02/08 18:55, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 3 |
> > lurker wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> But even if that fixes it, I would very much like to know what was going |
| 5 |
> >> on. From my debugging I have pretty much confirmed that it's that |
| 6 |
> >> find/cpio call that fails, but I cannot grasp why at all. Few bugs have |
| 7 |
> >> left me this perplexed. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > We are right in the middle of a release cycle with a couple of people |
| 10 |
> > doing repeated catalyst builds, and nobody is hitting this bug. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I know. I've had this problem since ~november, and the only other person |
| 13 |
> that have reported something similar is Åsmund. It would be interesting |
| 14 |
> if he could elaborate on the circumstances he got it in... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I did, in fact, get it building i686 on an amd64 platform. Everything worked |
| 17 |
perfectly until, I assume, I updated my portage snapshot. I can't recall |
| 18 |
having done anything else that should affect the build, but since I could |
| 19 |
work around the problem when I located it, I didn't take the time to |
| 20 |
investigate further (or submit a bug, since I felt there were too many |
| 21 |
potential factors at the time). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Åsmund Grammeltvedt |
| 25 |
Snap TV |
Archives