1 |
Ah, silly me. I should've figured it was something along those lines, |
2 |
but I had read mention of catalyst not forcing setarch anymore in the |
3 |
ChangeLog and got confused, I guess. Thanks, and sorry for the now |
4 |
seemingly inane question. |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
On Feb 5, 2008 8:16 AM, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> Derek Fedel wrote: |
9 |
> > I know! I know! 2.0.5 isn't supposed to have this problem. Let me |
10 |
> > explain, I've got a brand new install of 2007.0, a fresh copy of |
11 |
> > portage, and this as my spec file: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> How many times do we have to say this? :P |
14 |
> |
15 |
> If you're going to build your own CD, you also need to build your own set of |
16 |
> stages with the same snapshot. This is the *only* way to completely avoid the |
17 |
> various upgrade blockers that occur in the tree. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> -- |
20 |
> Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ |
21 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator |
22 |
> -- |
23 |
> gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o mailing list |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-catalyst@l.g.o mailing list |