1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> > > I'm having problems again with groupadd, |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > Maybe it's a problem with eutils.eclass? If it's inherited then it's |
5 |
> > fair to expect that all it's functions will work. How to solve this |
6 |
> > for user database changes that want to call programs in shadow? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> there is no problem with eutils.eclass |
9 |
|
10 |
Because it is not intended to function for stage2? Or because it is |
11 |
intended to assume that groupadd and friends are available? |
12 |
|
13 |
But where is the problem? One idea is to provide another |
14 |
implementation of these commands than the one in shadow. If that's |
15 |
a good idea, then where should that implementation go? |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
//Peter |