| 1 |
On Thursday 15 October 2009 12:48:50 Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > > I'm having problems again with groupadd, |
| 4 |
> > > |
| 5 |
> > > Maybe it's a problem with eutils.eclass? If it's inherited then it's |
| 6 |
> > > fair to expect that all it's functions will work. How to solve this |
| 7 |
> > > for user database changes that want to call programs in shadow? |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > there is no problem with eutils.eclass |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Because it is not intended to function for stage2? Or because it is |
| 12 |
> intended to assume that groupadd and friends are available? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
the release building tools have to make shadow available earlier for Linux |
| 15 |
targets |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> But where is the problem? One idea is to provide another |
| 18 |
> implementation of these commands than the one in shadow. If that's |
| 19 |
> a good idea, then where should that implementation go? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
this is a bad idea |
| 22 |
-mike |
Archives