| 1 |
I HAVE the ebuild for PGI (5.2, 6.0, 6.2.3, 6.2.5), but I'm not buying |
| 2 |
Gentoo a license. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 5 |
> Adam Carheden wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> Does anyone else out there use the PGI compilers, especially the |
| 8 |
>> fortran compiler (pgf90)? Some packages (like netcdf) support it in |
| 9 |
>> the ebuild, but it would be really nice to be able to use it by |
| 10 |
>> default. The trick is adding it to the fortran eclass. I've got a |
| 11 |
>> custom version of the fortran eclass in my overlay, but I also have to |
| 12 |
>> make a copy of the package I want to use in my overlay and add pgf90 |
| 13 |
>> to the list. Easier with Gentoo than other distros, but still a bit of |
| 14 |
>> a haste. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Does anyone else have this problem? Does anyone know if the devs have |
| 17 |
>> a good reason not to include pgi in portage or if they just haven't |
| 18 |
>> got around to it? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I would be happy to create an ebuild if someone buys Gentoo a license. |
| 22 |
> But the more general solution that needs to happen is for fortran.eclass |
| 23 |
> to get a way to override the known-working compiler list in ebuilds. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Thanks, |
| 26 |
> Donnie |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Adam Carheden |
| 30 |
Linux Systems Administrator |
| 31 |
970-491-8956 (o) |
| 32 |
970-556-2914 (c) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list |
Archives