1 |
G'day Brian, |
2 |
|
3 |
I've played around with OCFS2 and AoE in combination with Xen and they |
4 |
seem to work alright. |
5 |
|
6 |
I did have to increase the hearbeat timout for OCFS2 because all the |
7 |
machines would think the SAN went offline when there was _heavy_ load. |
8 |
Works a treat now that the timeout has been increased though. |
9 |
|
10 |
Cheers, |
11 |
|
12 |
Brad |
13 |
|
14 |
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:59:28 -0600 |
15 |
Brian Kroth <bpkroth@××××.edu> wrote: |
16 |
|
17 |
> Hello all, |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I currently manage about 40 Window, OSX, and Hardened Gentoo |
20 |
> servers. I will soon have 12 P4 servers that were previously used as |
21 |
> video encoders free as well as an Apple XRaid. With all this spare |
22 |
> hardware I thought I'd research setting up a cluster of servers |
23 |
> running Apache for load balancing and high availability. I'm also |
24 |
> looking into a MySQL cluster, but that wouldn't require a shared |
25 |
> filesystem. I'm wondering if anyone has done something like this |
26 |
> before and in particular knows a good filesystem to use so that each |
27 |
> of the servers can access and potentially write to the same storage |
28 |
> array. I've accomplished the same thing with XServes running OSX, |
29 |
> but they like to charge you a pretty penny for the XSan software that |
30 |
> allows this which I thought I'd try to avoid if possible. So far |
31 |
> I've seen only GFS, but haven't gotten much reading done on it yet. |
32 |
> Any other tips or insights would be appreciated as well. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Thanks, |
35 |
> Brian |
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-cluster@g.o mailing list |