Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: "Petteri R├Ąty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:31:10
Message-Id: 4978C99A.6030107@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] Council size & terms [WAS] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for January 22 by Donnie Berkholz
1 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2 > On 18:23 Thu 22 Jan , Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
3 >> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
4 >>> Discuss on-list before meeting
5 >>> ---------------------------------------
6 >>> - Council meta stuff (-council)
7 >>> - Can the size change? Minimum? Maximum?
8 >>> - Should we have 2-year staggered terms?
9 >> I'm in favor of a fixed size of council members, I'd like to see at
10 >> least 5 council members *if* developers want to change the size.
11 >
12 > What is your reasoning for this?
13 >
14
15 I would give the devs the possibility to restrict the council size if
16 they so want to do.
17
18 >
19 > Just as a point of reference, the council has voted to change GLEP 39 in
20 > the past. I definitely feel that we need to hold this discussion
21 > publicly and get input from everyone. I think the council should then
22 > take all this input into consideration and vote upon it.
23 >
24
25 I guess it depends on the scope of the changes. We can always vote
26 whether we want to hold a general vote on the issue :)
27
28 Regards,
29 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature