Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for October meeting
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:27:39
Message-Id: 20091001152710.6ed617b4@snowmobile
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for October meeting by Ulrich Mueller
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:22:01 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
> EAPI 3 is reopened for the purpose of including one sole feature, > namely preservation of file modification times, as outlined in > bug 264130, option B of comment 26 [1]. Both Portage and Pkgcore > already comply with this, so it would be zero implementation cost.
Why go with an inferior solution? Why not go with a solution that requires the package manager to fix broken mtimes? Also, what are the rules regarding this and things like stripping and other fixes and changes that the package manager performs upon files before merging them? -- Ciaran McCreesh


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-council] Agenda for October meeting Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>