| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 2008.09.02 05:44, Chrissy Fullam wrote: |
| 5 |
[snip] |
| 6 |
> ... I may not agree to it |
| 7 |
> and I |
| 8 |
> can accept that, but it is entirely within my right to ask for |
| 9 |
> clarification. |
| 10 |
[snip] |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Kind regards, |
| 13 |
> Christina Fullam |
| 14 |
> Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Chrissy, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
You bring up an interesting point about 'rights' which since its likely |
| 19 |
to set a precedent I would like to respond to. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The council is answerable to the entire developer community. The |
| 22 |
Foundation is answerable to its members. The two groups are not the |
| 23 |
same. You are a member of the former but not the latter, therefore |
| 24 |
have no rights with respect to the foundation. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Having fixed the precedent about rights of non members, let the |
| 27 |
discussion continue. Its a valid point to discuss no matter who brings |
| 28 |
it up. The foundation wants to be open an listen to anyone who |
| 29 |
wants to make contributions. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
- -- |
| 32 |
Regards, |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Roy Bamford |
| 35 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
| 36 |
gentoo-ops |
| 37 |
forum-mods |
| 38 |
treecleaners |
| 39 |
trustees |
| 40 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 41 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
iEYEARECAAYFAki9RdwACgkQTE4/y7nJvatebwCg/FZLcsPrJtLX64OpU21Sy3AS |
| 44 |
D4kAoO+26pT4Gdhl78LpXMfxHt+up5MI |
| 45 |
=GKNd |
| 46 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives