Gentoo Archives: gentoo-council

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-council@l.g.o
Cc: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o, gentoo-council@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:14:27
In Reply to: [gentoo-council] Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June by Donnie Berkholz
On Thursday 12 June 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 04:11 Wed 11 Jun , Brian Harring wrote: > > Reiterating the early request, I'd like the council to please discuss > > the current status of PMS, > > People actually working on the PMS would be better-placed to discuss its > current status, if by that you mean progress toward an approved spec. > The last I heard was a couple months ago when Ciaran asked us whether > there were any further major issues and removed kdebuild-1 from the PDF > to be approved.
he was told to remove kdebuild-1 from the repo and this has yet to happen
> > Effectively, we've watched it essentially progress into a standard > > that effectively only the paludis folk are adherent to (if in doubt, > > ask portage folk, my sending this mail is indicative of the pkgcore > > standpoint)- it's about time the council comment upon it in light of > > the general view. > > I'd like to know what's holding you back from contributing to it, > instead of telling us that someone else is doing things you don't like. > Is there some kind of technical barrier (like the TeX)? Or what? Are you > filing bugs against the parts you don't like? What's happening to them?
TeX isnt a format that integrates with Gentoo. should just convert it to docbook and be done with this garbage. -mike


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature