| 1 |
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 21:01, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Since avenj was too lazy to subscribe =P : |
| 4 |
> <avenj> wasn't there some kind of potential performance hit there? |
| 5 |
> <avenj> i thought i was thinking someone thought part of the issue with |
| 6 |
> RH's performance was utf8 default, but now i'm thinking i'm not sure |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
You don't mean python's alleged performance hit (this got shortly |
| 9 |
discussed on -dev by lqx) ? To attribute a full systems performance to |
| 10 |
UTF-8 sounds far fetched to me. Anyway, the benefits likely outclass |
| 11 |
performance loss. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
- foser |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |
Archives