| 1 |
Ok, but if we look for Amarok, |
| 2 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=amarok , there's a bunch of |
| 3 |
bugs for this application but it's not masked. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
And again, I'm just curious, I only wondered if there was something |
| 6 |
specifically bad with it. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Jean-Marc Beaune wrote: |
| 11 |
> > Hi, |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I've been thinking to move to KNetworkManager for a while (more than |
| 14 |
> > one year) and seeing that it's always masked didn't make me confident |
| 15 |
> > (I run as much as I can a stable arch). |
| 16 |
> > But finally I migrated from baselayout management to KNetworkManager |
| 17 |
> > few days ago and it seems to work quite well (not a long experience |
| 18 |
> > though). |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Hence, the question, I'm just curious. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > Thank you. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > P.S.: I used |
| 25 |
> > [url=http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/KNetworkManager]this[/url |
| 26 |
> > <http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/KNetworkManager%5Dthis%5B/url>] howto |
| 27 |
> > and it went just fine. |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> > -- |
| 30 |
> > Jean-Marc |
| 31 |
> > |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Here is some reading materials: |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=knetworkmanager |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> I think this is the one that has it masked: |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253788 |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> Comment number 2 mentions this is why it is masked among other reasons. |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> Most of the time if something is masked, there is a bug for it. Just |
| 45 |
> search for it. Resolved bugs should not make a package be masked but |
| 46 |
> open ones can. |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
> Hope that helps. |
| 49 |
> |
| 50 |
> Dale |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> :-) :-) |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
Jean-Marc |
Archives