1 |
A package can have a bug but not be masked. It depends on how serious |
2 |
the problem is. Apparently this one is serious enough that they masked |
3 |
it. It may be that it doesn't compile properly, could be a security |
4 |
thing or any number of other reasons that a package would be masked. It |
5 |
could even be a bug report farther upstream. I'm sure there is a reason |
6 |
since it has been so long. Just be glad it is working for you. It |
7 |
could be worse. |
8 |
|
9 |
Dale |
10 |
|
11 |
:-) :-) |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
Jean-Marc Beaune wrote: |
17 |
> Ok, but if we look for Amarok, |
18 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=amarok , there's a |
19 |
> bunch of bugs for this application but it's not masked. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> And again, I'm just curious, I only wondered if there was something |
22 |
> specifically bad with it. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com |
25 |
> <mailto:rdalek1967@×××××.com>> wrote: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Jean-Marc Beaune wrote: |
28 |
> > Hi, |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > I've been thinking to move to KNetworkManager for a while (more than |
31 |
> > one year) and seeing that it's always masked didn't make me |
32 |
> confident |
33 |
> > (I run as much as I can a stable arch). |
34 |
> > But finally I migrated from baselayout management to KNetworkManager |
35 |
> > few days ago and it seems to work quite well (not a long experience |
36 |
> > though). |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > Hence, the question, I'm just curious. |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > Thank you. |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > P.S.: I used |
43 |
> > [url=http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/KNetworkManager]this[/url |
44 |
> <http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/KNetworkManager%5Dthis%5B/url> |
45 |
> > <http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/KNetworkManager%5Dthis%5B/url>] |
46 |
> howto |
47 |
> > and it went just fine. |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > -- |
50 |
> > Jean-Marc |
51 |
> > |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Here is some reading materials: |
55 |
> |
56 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=knetworkmanager |
57 |
> |
58 |
> I think this is the one that has it masked: |
59 |
> |
60 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253788 |
61 |
> |
62 |
> Comment number 2 mentions this is why it is masked among other |
63 |
> reasons. |
64 |
> |
65 |
> Most of the time if something is masked, there is a bug for it. Just |
66 |
> search for it. Resolved bugs should not make a package be masked but |
67 |
> open ones can. |
68 |
> |
69 |
> Hope that helps. |
70 |
> |
71 |
> Dale |
72 |
> |
73 |
> :-) :-) |
74 |
> |
75 |
> |
76 |
> |
77 |
> |
78 |
> -- |
79 |
> Jean-Marc |