1 |
Evidently your not all that good a sysadmin as you claim to be and you surely can't admin a Gentoo box. The solution is easy, you are making it hard. Wipe your drive and install ubuntu.
|
2 |
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
|
3 |
|
4 |
-----Original Message-----
|
5 |
From: Lindsay Haisley <fmouse-gentoo@×××.com>
|
6 |
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 11:08:37
|
7 |
To: <gentoo-desktop@l.g.o>
|
8 |
Reply-to: gentoo-desktop@l.g.o
|
9 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-desktop] System problems
|
10 |
|
11 |
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 09:50 +0100, Roman Zilka wrote:
|
12 |
> By the way, why not gentoo-sources-2.6.36-r5? I hope you have a good |
13 |
> reason to run a system as ancient as that. Your system is swarming with |
14 |
> widely known security holes. |
15 |
|
16 |
Yes, I have a good reason for this, and I'll be responsible for security
|
17 |
on the box, which I'm well able to do. Security, and the relative
|
18 |
antiquity of the portage tree are not issues for which I'm seeking
|
19 |
advice, so your observations are totally beside the point, and not
|
20 |
particularly welcome. I'm well aware of both issues.
|
21 |
|
22 |
The challenge here is to get the system to boot with the newer kernel
|
23 |
and version of udev which I cited in my previous post.
|
24 |
|
25 |
/etc/fstab has been edited several times, as I noted in my post. The
|
26 |
kernel, udev and /etc/fstab have been now been reverted, as I also noted, so
|
27 |
I could get the desktop working. Considering that, posting any of the
|
28 |
information you've asked for would probably be useless.
|
29 |
|
30 |
Roman, if you don't have any useful insights based on the information I
|
31 |
already posted, then please don't post on thread and leave it to others
|
32 |
who may.
|
33 |
|
34 |
Having said this, I'll ask you one question:
|
35 |
|
36 |
> Also, by upgrading to a little less ancient versions than 2.6.29 |
37 |
> you won't have the same situation like now boomerang back at you in the |
38 |
> near future. |
39 |
|
40 |
Can you cite a source or sources for this assertion? Is there a known
|
41 |
problem with kernel 2.6.29, or the portage tree which spec'd that
|
42 |
kernel? Is there any discussion, bug report, or anything that you can
|
43 |
cite noting that this was a known problem at one point and addressed at
|
44 |
a later date?
|
45 |
|
46 |
In almost every case, I've found that people who lecture me online about
|
47 |
my system admin practices don't really have a handle on the issue about
|
48 |
which I'm writing. Please prove me wrong :-)
|
49 |
|
50 |
--
|
51 |
Lindsay Haisley |"What if the Hokey Pokey really IS all it
|
52 |
FMP Computer Services | really is about?"
|
53 |
512-259-1190 |
|
54 |
http://www.fmp.com | -- Jimmy Buffett
|
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
--
|
58 |
Lindsay Haisley |"Windows .....
|
59 |
FMP Computer Services | life's too short!"
|
60 |
512-259-1190 |
|
61 |
http://www.fmp.com | - Brad Johnston |