1 |
Currently, I'm running a rather old Radeon 9200 series card. I'd like to |
2 |
upgrade, but don't know which of the newer Radeons work best with either |
3 |
of the freedomware drivers (xf86-video-ati or xf86-video-radeonhd). |
4 |
|
5 |
I do have some requirements. |
6 |
|
7 |
First, in keeping with what Donnie B. recommended in an interview I read |
8 |
(was it on LWN or somewhere else?), I want to stick with an AMD/ATI/ |
9 |
Radeon card. |
10 |
|
11 |
Second, it's an AGP 4/8x slot. No PCI-E (tho I could do PCI-X, but I |
12 |
don't believe they made graphics cards for that). |
13 |
|
14 |
Third, I'd like 2x dual-link DVI-I. My current monitors are both analog/ |
15 |
hd-15 connector, 1600x1200, stacked for 1600x2400. I'm planning on |
16 |
upgrading to preferably dual 2560x1600 digital, but at least dual |
17 |
1920x1200. The former would certainly need dual-link DVI; I'm not sure |
18 |
on the latter. Thus, I need dual outputs, dual-link DVI to handle the |
19 |
bandwidth of the digital when I upgrade to it, and DVI-I so I can use the |
20 |
adaptors and keep the analog in the mean time. |
21 |
|
22 |
So I need recommendations from anyone running that sort of setup. Also, |
23 |
which driver do you use and why? |
24 |
|
25 |
Also, to anyone running the xf86-video-ati driver, I've not been able to |
26 |
get the ~arch 6.8.0 version to work at those resolutions for me. I can |
27 |
get it to do 1600x1200 on one monitor, or (IIRC, I was tired and a bit |
28 |
fuzzy headed when testing) 1024x768 on both, but I haven't gotten |
29 |
>1024x768 to work on both yet. As a consequence I package.masked it |
30 |
here, and am still on 6.6.0, running merged framebuffer. Yes, I know |
31 |
they killed merged framebuffer for 6.8.0, in favor of separate configs |
32 |
and xinerama, but altho I've had experience with a xinerama config some |
33 |
time back and as I said I can get it running in dual 1024x768 mode, I |
34 |
can't seem to get it to run higher. Is that a limitation of the 9200 |
35 |
series in Xinerama mode, or of the driver, or of my config, somehow? |
36 |
|
37 |
I /think/ it may be due to the recommended resolution of my 19" monitor, |
38 |
as I'm stretching it a bit running it at 1600x1200, but 1024x768 is just |
39 |
ridiculous on it, let alone on my 21". I think RandR may be seeing that |
40 |
1024x768 recommended and that I may need to tell it to ignore that, but I |
41 |
don't really know how to do that with RandR 1.2 yet, only the old way, |
42 |
which RandR seems to be ignoring. |
43 |
|
44 |
That second question will likely need to go to the xorg list if I don't |
45 |
find an answer in the FAQ and RandR 1.2 docs etc that I've not looked at |
46 |
very closely yet, unless I get lucky and find someone with a similarly |
47 |
large desktop real-estate config running the driver here, but I thought |
48 |
I'd ask, and since I'm subscribed here and not to the xorg list yet... |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
52 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
53 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-desktop@l.g.o mailing list |