| 1 |
On Воскресенье 04 января 2009 20:14:57 Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I wanted to raise this, and it should possibly be an issue we discuss at |
| 5 |
> the next meeting. Should all live ebuilds default to +kdeprefix? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Personally I think they should. Anyone wanting an all -kdeprefix system |
| 8 |
> can set -kdeprefix in their make.conf, and those of us keeping a stable |
| 9 |
> in -kdeprefix, and a live in +kdeprefix can continue to do this. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> When I originally committed the eclass changes to the default for live |
| 12 |
> ebuilds this was the case. It was since changed without any discussion. |
| 13 |
> I think the previous behaviour represents the most flexible approach for |
| 14 |
> our user and development community. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Is there a flaw in this logic? As far as I can see anyone wanting the |
| 17 |
> current behaviour can add a line to their make.conf, the old behaviour |
| 18 |
> is impossible to reproduce now without maintaining a patched |
| 19 |
> kde4-base.eclass. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Thanks, |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Marcus |
| 24 |
Personaly I think that all kde-base live ebuilds should be in +kdeprefix while |
| 25 |
misc packages susch as amarok and so on could be both +kdeprefix and - kdeprefix |
| 26 |
Also I think that misc packages could be installed with snapshots or even |
| 27 |
stable kde |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov |
| 30 |
Gentoo Team Ru |
Archives