1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Hi. |
5 |
|
6 |
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: |
7 |
> Alexey Shvetsov wrote: |
8 |
>> On Воскресенье 04 января 2009 20:14:57 Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>>> Hi, |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> I wanted to raise this, and it should possibly be an issue we discuss at |
13 |
>>> the next meeting. Should all live ebuilds default to +kdeprefix? |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> Personally I think they should. Anyone wanting an all -kdeprefix system |
16 |
>>> can set -kdeprefix in their make.conf, and those of us keeping a stable |
17 |
>>> in -kdeprefix, and a live in +kdeprefix can continue to do this. |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> When I originally committed the eclass changes to the default for live |
20 |
>>> ebuilds this was the case. It was since changed without any discussion. |
21 |
>>> I think the previous behaviour represents the most flexible approach for |
22 |
>>> our user and development community. |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>> Is there a flaw in this logic? As far as I can see anyone wanting the |
25 |
>>> current behaviour can add a line to their make.conf, the old behaviour |
26 |
>>> is impossible to reproduce now without maintaining a patched |
27 |
>>> kde4-base.eclass. |
28 |
>>> |
29 |
>>> Thanks, |
30 |
>>> |
31 |
>>> Marcus |
32 |
>>> |
33 |
>> Personaly I think that all kde-base live ebuilds should be in +kdeprefix while |
34 |
>> misc packages susch as amarok and so on could be both +kdeprefix and - kdeprefix |
35 |
>> Also I think that misc packages could be installed with snapshots or even |
36 |
>> stable kde |
37 |
>> |
38 |
> You didn't address the main question I was posing - should live ebuilds |
39 |
> of misc packages default to +kdeprefix? I think they should and see no |
40 |
> reason for not doing this. It allows people to maintain a live/stable |
41 |
> system using -/+kdeprefix respectively if they want to. If they want |
42 |
> everything installed in /usr they can explicitly set -kdeprefix. |
43 |
|
44 |
I agree with cryos that all live ebuilds should be +kdeprefix. For all |
45 |
those that think otherwise, I would like to hear how you plan to handle |
46 |
the collisions with non-live ebuilds. |
47 |
|
48 |
> You bring up several other points but I am not sure they all need |
49 |
> considering at the same time... |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Thanks, |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Marcus |
54 |
> |
55 |
|
56 |
- -- |
57 |
Regards, |
58 |
|
59 |
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org |
60 |
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / SPARC / KDE |
61 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
62 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
63 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
64 |
|
65 |
iEYEARECAAYFAklhNSgACgkQcAWygvVEyAIpogCeIr9Lu2JQNLnZWcgxDdXzoVh/ |
66 |
XZAAmwX7DfI9EMtHjOzqkyi1eDrgZNrt |
67 |
=nNjO |
68 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |