Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps | ||
| Date: | Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:33:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140727223338.25c32791@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps by Rich Freeman |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 17:26:27 -0400 |
| 2 | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > But, in that case you can put the necessary ebuilds into your overlay |
| 4 | > and then portage can make everything right. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Oh? Please explain to us a) how the overlay interaction *actually* works |
| 7 | with dynamic dependencies currently, and b) how it can work both in the |
| 8 | case you describe, and in the case where an overlay has a substantially |
| 9 | different ebuild for the same package. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps | Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com> |