Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: foser <foser@×××××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo ~arch testing policy?
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:14:11
Message-Id: 1074694400.5478.9.camel@rivendell
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo ~arch testing policy? by Ryan Finnie
1 Hi,
2
3 as others wrote there are some policies on how to mark stable and that
4 it shouldn't normally happen the day after something has been added to
5 ~.
6
7 On the other hand it is just a fact that a lot of ~arch upgrading
8 happens trough stumbling over it (so a lot of packages stay longer than
9 needed in ~arch), there have been some efforts to attack this problem,
10 but not too successful. This is an issue that needs attention and ideas
11 on how to solve this in a satisfactory manner. Since you seem to
12 actively care about getting things to stable (not everybody does), maybe
13 you have some ideas on how this should be handled ? Bugzilla is just not
14 the perfect place for bump-to-stable requests & stability feedback on ~.
15
16 - foser
17
18
19
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo ~arch testing policy? George Shapovalov <george@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo ~arch testing policy? Eric G Ortego <eric@×××××××××.org>