| 1 |
Lars Wendler wrote: |
| 2 |
> >> - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd |
| 3 |
> >> crap. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Riiight... as udev has anything else to do with systemd other than |
| 8 |
> being uselessly integrated into systemd whereas it can still work on |
| 9 |
> its own with no whatsoever relation to systemd. But yes, totally |
| 10 |
> childish... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I wouldn't say childish but it doesn't seem too useful to me. It |
| 13 |
seems clear (at least to me) that even if there isn't so tight |
| 14 |
integration of udev with systemd today it's reasonable to expect |
| 15 |
that there will be tight integration in the soonish future, as |
| 16 |
upstream continues to move in the direction they like. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
There's nothing wrong per se with a future udev ebuild which |
| 19 |
applies a mega-patch onto systemd sources in order to get udevd |
| 20 |
standalone but I think that's probably not the most useful |
| 21 |
contribution you can make to Gentoo, Lars. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Of course in the end you should work on what you like, but in your |
| 24 |
place I would probably focus on something else, probably eudev. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
//Peter |
Archives