1 |
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:46:23 +0100 Peter Stuge wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>Lars Wendler wrote: |
4 |
>> >> - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd |
5 |
>> >> crap. |
6 |
>> > |
7 |
>> >childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Riiight... as udev has anything else to do with systemd other than |
10 |
>> being uselessly integrated into systemd whereas it can still work on |
11 |
>> its own with no whatsoever relation to systemd. But yes, totally |
12 |
>> childish... |
13 |
> |
14 |
>I wouldn't say childish but it doesn't seem too useful to me. It |
15 |
>seems clear (at least to me) that even if there isn't so tight |
16 |
>integration of udev with systemd today it's reasonable to expect |
17 |
>that there will be tight integration in the soonish future, as |
18 |
>upstream continues to move in the direction they like. |
19 |
> |
20 |
>There's nothing wrong per se with a future udev ebuild which |
21 |
>applies a mega-patch onto systemd sources in order to get udevd |
22 |
>standalone but I think that's probably not the most useful |
23 |
>contribution you can make to Gentoo, Lars. |
24 |
> |
25 |
>Of course in the end you should work on what you like, but in your |
26 |
>place I would probably focus on something else, probably eudev. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> |
29 |
>//Peter |
30 |
|
31 |
As long as it's feasible I will continue patching the systemd crap out |
32 |
of udev. |
33 |
The worst part always was and still is the man pages as one cannot |
34 |
re-use previous patches on them. Whatever systemd maniacs are doing |
35 |
there, it's the most time consuming part of the patching. |
36 |
The fun part is, it's still quite easy to get udev standalone without |
37 |
anything being related to systemd (with the exception of the systemd |
38 |
unit files which still can be used with my ebuilds). |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Lars Wendler |
42 |
Gentoo package maintainer |
43 |
GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6FC |