| 1 |
At 12:08 AM 9/30/02 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
>i would have to disagree on this ... |
| 3 |
>running a todo list is kind of out of scope of opening public access to the |
| 4 |
>-core list. plus, turning -core into the center of todo operations is outside |
| 5 |
>the scode of the -core list. |
| 6 |
>discussions that happen on -core are meant for the 'core' of Gentoo. |
| 7 |
>also, as we've seen in the past, some topics that are discussed on -core |
| 8 |
>can lead to an explosion of misguided discussions. |
| 9 |
>-mike |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I must agree. The openness of the -core list is unrelated to a todo list |
| 13 |
and should be considered as a separate issue. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The person who maintains to todo list must have to support/guidance of the |
| 16 |
core developers and should have access to the -core list to ensure that the |
| 17 |
todo list does not conflict with the direction that -core is going. The |
| 18 |
obvious way to accomplish this would be to have one of the core members |
| 19 |
maintain the todo list. This is exactly the type of non-technical routine |
| 20 |
work that the todo list is designed to off load from the core group. Only |
| 21 |
the core developers can decide what direction that they want to go on that one. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Fred Van Andel |
Archives