| 1 |
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 14:59, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> Do you mind reading and replying to the second paragraph (which happens to |
| 3 |
> be the only new information I brought to this thread). Underlining words to |
| 4 |
> emphasize a point to me that I've opened by agreeing is really not |
| 5 |
> necessary. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I did not want to hurt your feelings by underlining, Jason. :) You missed a |
| 8 |
point in your wording of the digikam example in your first paragraph (while |
| 9 |
implied in the second), though. It's not only that libkexif and libkipi need |
| 10 |
to be rebuilt, but any other application (e.g. showimg) depending on them as |
| 11 |
well. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> You've misunderstand what is meant by "locking ebuild dependencies". I gave |
| 14 |
> you a definition in my second paragraph. Please have a re-read. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I did not comment on what you wrote, but on Ciaranm's and Brian's ideas about |
| 17 |
using slot dependencies regarding KDE packages. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Carsten |
Archives